Bad Memories & Trauma Removal 8.

By Nachrichten

Article 6 remains the reference for the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR – by Otmar Jenner). This text is about (B) – i.e. finding a so-called anchor in the preliminary talk (A) and subsequent procedures. Namely:

B.a: Finding a positive anchor. Very simple: a particularly beautiful situation / experience in the life of C (client). This situation / experience should be described to T (therapist) briefly but clearly, so that T can set this positive anchor if C reacts with signs of re-traumatisation during the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

B.b.: The naming of the trauma to be worked on during the session. For this purpose C names the most serious psychological and/or physical injury inflicted on him. And then concentrates this traumatic experience into one sentence (example: my father hit me with a belt in the basement).

B.c.: Kinesiological testing of trauma activity. Helpful so that C as well as T get an impression of the current relevance of the trauma.

To B.a.: Finding a positive anchor. Often forgotten by T in connection with the TAR. It is understandable that the search for a positive anchor in the session is like a pleasant but superfluous distraction from the destructive and incisive experience of the trauma to be treated.
However, since it is usually impossible to assess before treatment whether the anchor will be needed afterwards, the anchor should be available immediately afterwards. For this purpose, however, it must be found and activated beforehand.
What is the ideal time for this? A moment that distracts as little as possible. This is probably the beginning of the preliminary talk. If it becomes clear that the session will be about Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR), the anchor should be found and activated.
What does ‘activatable’ mean? C has described T a very beautiful experience precisely enough that T – if necessary – can say to C: “Now please remember …”. This procedure is called setting the anchor. T must therefore have these decisive sentences pre-formulated in his mind before starting TAR.

To B.b.: In the preliminary talk, a mental injury (perhaps several) was discussed. Now we need to focus. If several hurtful events have taken place. One of them is chosen. Probably, the one with the greatest pain impulse. Or, on the contrary, the one with the least intensity of pain – for example, because C wants to „approach this more gently”. T can also ask C: What do you want to work on in this session?
Once the traumatic experience is named, the event should be concentrated in one sentence (another example: when my mother forgot me in the supermarket).

To B.c: The kinesiological test. The test is performed on the left arm. Only if it is not possible on the left arm, the test is performed on the right arm.

  1. T asks C to lift his left arm and stretch it at a right angle, i.e. horizontally away from his body, and to react with counter-pressure when T then grabs this arm with his hands approximately at his wrist and then pulls it down for about 2 seconds. C holds against it, pushing the arm upwards.  T feels C’s force and says to C, “This is a yes.”
  2. Then T says to C, “I can test with you”. Immediately thereafter pulls the arm down again. C holds against it again.  If a clear drop in strength is felt, this is a no. And steps 1 and 2 should be repeated on the right arm. In case of a yes, continue with 3.
  3. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 70% active.” If the muscular response is weak, with a no, continue with 7. Otherwise 4.
  4. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 80% active.” If the answer is no, the result is between 70 and 80 percent. In the case of a yes, however, the result is higher.
  5. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 90% active.” If the answer is no, the result is between 80 and 90 percent. In the case of a yes, however, the result is higher. Even with a yes, the test ends at this point. A result between 90 and 100 percent is sufficiently accurate.
  6. Up to this point, kinesiological testing strengthens the focus of C on the trauma, which in turn will intensify the release effect of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).
  7. If the 70% activity was denied, T now says, “Your trauma … is still 60% active.” If the answer is yes, the test ends here. If the answer is no, the test continues with 8.
  8. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, “is still 50% active.” If the muscular reaction is strong, i.e. a yes, the test ends at this point. If the answer is no, the test continues with 9.
  9. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, “is still 40% active.” If the muscular reaction is strong, i.e. a yes, the test ends at this point. Although the trauma is weakly active, it can still be processed. If the answer is no, the test continues at 10.
  10. “Your trauma …,“ T to C says, “is still 30% active.” If this is answered with yes, the procedure of TAR is possible, but will probably lead to a weak release reaction later on. This applies all the more clearly to a no. This is because the “trauma activity” is below a threshold value that is useful for the application of procedure C. Then C (exploration and intervention on the treatment couch – with steps C1 – C10) would be omitted. Instead, D (stimulation of the brain hemispheres and TAR-add-on through targeted eye movement – with steps D1 – D6) could be applied. And / or continue with E (TAR-add-on by singing the warrior syllables – E1 – E3).

More on the next steps in subsequent articles …
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Bad Memories & Trauma Removal 7.

By Nachrichten

The previous article (6.) is now the reference and thus the basis for further considerations and comments.

This text is about the preliminary talk (A) before the Trauma Abscission & Removal (abbreviated: TAR – by Otmar Jenner). A very essential part of the session, which is about memory and the processing of memory. Remembering is difficult enough. But the question of processing – problematic …
Some moments of the past we can remember clearly. Others we see less clearly, however hard we try. And others we have lost in a kind of fog. And then there are the moments and times that seem to be erased. These gaps, however, are very subtle. They almost always point to traumatisation. It is the gaps in the continuum of the self that arise as a result of split-off experiences.
The biography of a person is, retrospectively seen, to be regarded as one single narrative. A person as a story, a novel of a life – the different chapters of this narrative are written in principle and logically sequentially. A ribbon woven from events and experiences, which is woven further and further in the time line. But it does not show up in the memory as logically and continuously as life has continued. Events are later jumbled up, are difficult or impossible to assign to time. Some moments, times, events are completely missing. As if someone had torn pages from his own biography.
Nothing about this is as random as it often seems. In fact, these missing pages are deliberately erased. namely, unconsciously. If they were as easy and clear to read as the paragraphs or whole chapters from other times, they would go beyond the scope of the book. In fact, they must be missing so that the owner of his own biography is not killed by them.

This is exactly why the pages were removed. Let’s say, put aside. Well hidden in a place that is difficult to access, in a safe – namely in your own subconscious. What lies buried deep there is deliberately and by one’s own power, even through the most intense thinking, mostly no longer findable and accessible.
That’s a good thing, one might think now. What is forgotten may rest there forever. It would be nice if it would work that way. But unfortunately it doesn’t. What has been hidden in the safe of the subconscious, then hidden from the access of the conscious mind as if through a firewall, has an effect. Unfortunately, for life. And that aftereffect is often very unhealthy. It’s as if these deeply hidden memories are starting to mold and become scruffy. At some point, this has to be ventilated and cleaned up to make you feel better. Or to put it another way: If the garbage is left lying around too long it becomes a rotten corpse.

The preliminary talk is an attempt to open a window of consciousness, so that some light also brightens up the darkness of the subconscious. En passant so to speak, like a scattered light. Because in this room, simply switching on the light does not work – unfortunately. To illuminate the subconscious is a long process. If a person’s day-consciousness were a flashlight, it would take many attempts to shine into the deepest depths of the soul before anything illuminating would become visible. The mysteriousness of one’s own subconsciousness is like a shadow that swallows the light of the focused day-consciousness. Or more succinctly: the subconscious is so irrational that it cannot be dealt with by the rationality of day-consciousness.

Oh, then one could let go all thinking, all asking, all investigating, all wanting to understand and just surrender to the inner pain. Doesn’t clear up anyway.
No, wrong! Even if one cannot simply wipe away, think away or otherwise undo old wounds, deep-seated pain, old injuries and their real, subconsciously stuck reasons. Even if one cannot simply dig out the pages torn out of the biography. Nevertheless, the attempt to devote oneself to one’s own deep-seated injuries is already salutary.
Yes, this attempt alone is valuable. For only the intention to meet oneself in one’s own abysses has a positive mental effect.
Let us call this effect, for simplicity’s sake, resonance.

The person who says I have a mental pain and wants to dedicate myself to the reasons for it – this person resonates within himself and experiences an emotional feedback. A wave builds up. In fact, I think this wave is bigger than the thoughts it contains, because it consists of feelings that are triggered by thoughts.

The preliminary talk with client (C) serves exactly this purpose: To create the resonance with K and to build the wave. When the wave is there, i.e. emotionality becomes present, then the next steps of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) can take place.

How exactly does a therapist (T) create the wave (of emotionality) with C?

Very simple: by asking logical questions accompanied by genuine interest.
Example:
What brings you to me?
I have a problem that …
Can you say when exactly it started?
Well, during the year…
What happened back then?
I did this, and then this happens…
I understood you, but can you describe it to me in more detail?

Go on and ask – until the wave is there. No, this text is not about surfing. But it needs courage here too. The courage to ask as precisely as possible without shyness. Your questions may stir up as long as they are devoted to therapeutic work. In fact, you should be stirring. This is exactly what resonance does. A resonance that is like a beacon of knowledge for K. In the moment of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) a light often shines on you. Figuratively speaking.
To put it logically: the preliminary talk in the sense of an almost rational cognitive process is necessary for the Trauma Abscission & Removal to take effect on a deeper, namely irrational level.

Read more about this in the next articles.
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Bad Memories & Trauma Removal 6.

By Nachrichten

The shelter exists because therapists (T) have clarified their attitude towards clients (C) as already described (abstinence, equal attention, gender neutrality, no emotional self-interest).

Now to the course of a session with Trauma Abscission & Removal (abbreviated: TAR – by Otmar Jenner).

A. The preliminary conversation:

  1. C has a problem and reports about it. This is the reason why C comes to the practice of T at all.
  2. Since not all problems are based on traumatizations, T is challenged to find out in a conversation with C whether her/his problem (of whatever kind) is the result of a traumatization.  If so, there is the possibility of a recent experience of horror, not yet integrated horror, or the possibility of a distant mental injury (perhaps suffered in childhood).
  3. T then asks C specifically for incisive, painful experiences (psychological as well as physical).
  4. From C’s reactions (strong emotional expression, drastic verbal description or, on the contrary, almost indifference, as if standing next to her-/himself, apathy), T can tell how serious the traumatizations experienced by C are and whether a trauma detachment makes sense in this case.  
  5. If this is to be affirmed, T explains the meaning of further work on this trauma (with the aim of dissolving it / trauma exploration and intervention) and describes C the further procedure.
  6. If C agrees and expressly declares this to T, the further steps of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) can take place.

B. Further preliminary work (an anchor, a trauma, a test):

  1. Finding a positive anchor: T asks C to remember a very beautiful life experience, a moment of joy and strength.
  2. T asks C to describe this moment very precisely and to recall it scenically (like in a short film): this will be the positive anchor.
  3. T also stores the positive anchor in his memory so that he can set it at C at any time. This is when the recapitulation of negative experiences during the TAR seems to overstrain C and the treatment is about to go of the rail (which I myself have never experienced before with any such treatment, but nevertheless consider it possible).
  4. Isolating the trauma: T now comes back to the incisive and painful experiences already mentioned by C and asks C to name the most painful.
  5. Kinesiological testing of the trauma: T asks C to stand up and stretch out his left arm. T now presses C’s wrist with increasing intensity for 2 to 3 seconds and asks C to hold against it. It is not a question of who is the strongest, but rather of C’s muscular response to the increasing pressure that T exerts. T remembers C’s impulse.
  6. Now T speaks to C: “I can test with you.” And repeats the pressure on C’s wrist on the outstretched arm. C’s impulse must not be significantly weaker, because that would be a no.
  7. In this case the procedure would have to be repeated a few minutes later, then on C’s other arm.
  8. However, if further testing is immediately possible T says to C: “Your trauma is over 50 percent active.“
  9. If C then vigorously resists, which corresponds to a yes, T repeats the test at C, but now saying: “Over 70 percent of your trauma is active”. If thereupon a yes comes again, the test can be repeated with “90 percent”. If “50 percent” has already been answered weakly, i.e. with a “no”, you would have to find out whether it is a value above or below 30 percent. Because below 30 percent is so weak that this “residual traumatization” cannot possibly be solved with TAR right now.
  10. For the further work on the trauma it is necessary that T as well as C keep the tested active value of the trauma in memory, in order to be able to measure the treatment success later (even if it is not at all completely describable, what exactly this active value measures, because it is a size of the subconscious).
  11. Since exploration and intervention in TAR include mechanical aspects, possible medical exclusion criteria for such treatment must be established at the latest now: a tendency to brittle bones or osteoporosis, a tumor disease in the abdomen or chest, cardiac pacemakers, etc. Then C would have to be omitted and the procedure under D would have to be continued. 

C. Exploration and intervention on the treatment couch: So for C while lying, while T sits on one side (ideally on a rolling stool). Because the moment of the actual procedure of TAR is approaching. However, all steps that take place in the same way should be explained briefly and precisely to C beforehand.

  1. As soon as C lies stretched out with his back on the treatment couch (and the further course is communicated), T places one hand on C’s sternum (heart chakra) and the other hand on C’s stomach (solar plexus). As I said: positioned so that the fingertips of T’s hand on the heart chakra point directly upwards, i.e. in the direction of C’s head, while T’s hand on the solar plexus is positioned so that the fingertips point to one side of the body, but not towards C’s feet. This positioning of the hands is important to avoid possible alignment with genitals. If C is female and T male, C can also place her hands on the corresponding parts of her body, whereupon T would place his hands on C’s. C’s hands then built a kind of buffer (which is often perceived as protection against male T for women).  Remember: The shelter in the sense of a resilient confidence building is of central importance for the success of a treatment).
  2. T now asks C to close both eyes and to remember as closely as possible the traumatisation experienced (visual, acoustic, olfactory, tactile). In short: visible, audible, smellable, perceptible) and at the same time breathe in and out deeply.
  3. T follows with his hands the raising and lowering of C’s chest during one or two of C’s breaths, then concentrating on C’s exhalation and slowly exerting a growing pressure on C’s chest and abdomen.
  4. T may have the feeling of touching C in her/his innermost, as if T’s hands were wandering into C’s body to grasp a deeply hidden pain. I would like to emphasize that such a feeling is not as irrational as it sounds according to this methodology, but quite plausible. Because through the deliberate and conscious memory of C’s deep-seated injury and the additional intention of T to heal exactly this injury, now probably also noticeable from T, namely the hardening of C’s character armour – this is precisely what happens in the so-called exploration of trauma. Namely the possibility to feel this directly. T will probably perceive a kind of tingling in his hands. But if this is not perceptible to T, it does not mean that the procedure is not suitable for T as the performer.
  5. At the moment of greatest intensity, which also means an increased mechanical pressure and the moment of intervention, T lifts both hands from the body of C and claps once or several times into the hands. This is a signal to the subconscious of C. It means: Now it is accomplished, the trauma resolved. The clapping of hands can be so loud that C is easily frightened. Even if this is not perceived as pleasant, it is still helpful. Because all the deeper the trauma detachment finds its way into the subconscious.
  6. Immediately afterwards, T makes a subtle wiping movement with one or both hands about 10 to 20 centimetres above C’s body. Beginning at the solar plexus towards the head and beyond the head. Even if it sounds strange: With it T wipes the trauma energy from the body of C. Absolutely: without the slightest physical touch.
  7. Right now C should keep her/his eyes closed. An opening of the eyes would distract C from the inner perception by external perception, whereby the release effect of the trauma detachment would possibly be overlooked or rather “over felt”. If the release effect is not perceived from C immediately, this does not mean that the trauma detachment has failed. The release effect often comes in waves. With some people in gentle waves, with others powerful. With some people are so powerful that they get scared and T have to calm them down.
  8. If calming persuasion does not help, the anchor should be set. T then reminds C of the anchor and asks C for a few minutes to think of nothing else than this beautiful idea.
  9. The release effect is best described as an energy wave. Perceptible from C itself, but also perceptible from T. As an energy wave that rolls from C into T’s field (aura), flows and feels different with every trauma release. Every now and then the wave comes with a delay, so the release effect only occurs after two minutes at the most. For T it’s a matter of waiting for this time.
  10. Anyway, it is helpful if C rests undisturbed for a few minutes after the procedure of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) – trauma exploration and intervention.

D. Stimulation of the brain hemispheres and a TAR add-on through guided eye movement: T now helps C to straighten up from the couch and to move into a seated posture. Either on a standing chair or sideways on the treatment couch, facing T.

  1. T now asks C to look with her/his eyes at the tip of her/his index finger (it doesn’t matter whether the finger of T’s right or left hand is used). T then raises the hand with the extended index finger in front of C’s face so that C can look at T’s fingertip from a distance of about 50 to 80 centimeters.
  2. T now asks C to think again of the trauma that has just been detached (without, however, immersing her-/himself in it in the sense of a scenic experience).
  3. Directly after this explanation T draws with his index finger the figure of a lying eight into the air in front of C’s face. Starting with a movement towards right side up (seen from T). Again and again. For about one minute to one and a half minutes. Eights so large, i.e. with such a wide movement of T’s finger in front of C’s eyes, that C’s eyes move to the outermost edges of her/his view, but not beyond, so that C can follow the finger movement of T with both eyes. And just so fast that no jerky eye movements occur, but an evenly wandering after-glance from C is possible. The meaning of this probably strange-looking action of T: Because both eyes are linked with different hemispheres of the brain, the left and right hemisphere of C’s brain are harmonized. Since traumatization is not preserved equally in both hemispheres and thus remains more active in one side, the eye movement guided  as described causes a destructive memory backlog to flow off (probably on the right brain hemisphere – but this has yet to be researched sufficiently to be considered factual). T’s finger movement ends with a movement upwards – so never descending.
  4. Then T lets the hand sink and asks C now for current sensations concerning the trauma just solved. Possible answers from C: “Feels a little better.” – “Feel relieved.” – “Something’s come loose.” – “A stone is gone.” – “Feel much softer.” – Can’t say exactly what is. But it feels different.” – “I don’t know, I can’t judge.“
  5. In any case, T now repeats the painting of the figure eight in front of C’s face described in point 3 (D). And then point 4 (D). This is practiced five to seven times in total.
  6. Then C needs a break of up to five minutes.

E.  TAR add-on by singing the so called warrior syllables A, Om, Hung, Ram, dZa: The meaning of the syllables are: A for Buddha – love, Om for Brahma – devotion, Hung for shelter – joy, Ram – truthfulness, dZa – action! T should not make a secret of the meaning. But too much explanation is distracting..

  1. T sings the warrior syllables slowly, but as expressively as possible, then asks C to remember the emotional injury already dealt with (but without diving into the idea of it in the sense of scenic experience).
  2. T now asks C to join in, i.e. to sing along.
  3. 7 cycles should be sung. If this is not sufficient, another 7 cycles can follow..

F. Final kinesiological testing of the remaining trauma activity:

  1. Continue as described in B 5 to 9.
  2. If the “active value” of the detached trauma now exceeds 30 percent, another follow-up session should be arranged at a later date to repeat the entire procedure described up to this point.

G. Concluding discussion: C takes stock of the experience, describes the current mood. T in turn gives feedback and shares his own impressions, provided that they are directly related to the therapeutic work performed.

As I said before: I developed the method of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) and I am therefore the originator. Therapists can use this procedure. However, with the hint that it comes from me. Publications on this, I would like to confirm here in all clarity, require an authorization by me.
All aspects presented in this article will be described in more details in further articles.

Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscession #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Bad Memories & Trauma Removal 5.

By Nachrichten

In order to understand the presentation of the procedure of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) that I have discovered, no further training is required. But prior medical knowledge is just as helpful as knowledge in psychology is useful. Since the procedure has manual aspects, it can only be used by therapists (abbreviated: T) under certain conditions. Non-medical and alternative practitioners may use it in the sense of depth-psychologically founded exploration and intervention. Exploration and intervention in TAR takes place by placing the hands with the palms of the hands on two parts of the client’s body (abbreviated: C).

TAR is practiced by T while sitting or standing. C lies on the back, probably on a treatment couch, but stretched out on the floor would also be possible (but the further description here refers to a position of C on a treatment couch).

So C is located on the couch, T sits or stands on one side next to it. T now places the hands on C as follows: one hand on the lower end of the breastbone on the chest of C, i.e. on the heart chakra, the other hand on the abdomen, i. e. the solar plexus of C.

Whether T sits on the left or right side of C’s body – accordingly T’s right hand or left hand lies on C’s heart chakra and the right or left hand on C’s solar plexus –, is less important than the actual positioning of the hands on the body. The hand, which is placed on the heart chakra, is positioned in such a way that the fingertips point directly upwards, i.e. in the direction of C’s head. On the contrary: is the hand on the solar plexus placed with the fingertips pointing to one side of C’s body, but not in the direction of C’s feet (this is important – why exactly will be explained in detail later).

With these touches at the two points T can now reach the character armour of C directly and well. Exploration and intervention of a traumatization experienced by C are now possible. If this succeeds, the resulting effect can be described as a release (a relief and liberation, release from a heavy load).

According to Wilhelm Reich, a person’s character armour is always developed through painful experiences in childhood and the resulting resistance and limitation in his ability to surrender tot the flow of life. No wonder: devotion in the sense of opening the self is associated with the risk of further injury. The medieval knights already knew this when they stumbled through the Middle Ages crammed into their metal armour. The removal of the armament is therefore a liberation. But at the wrong time and in the wrong place, it may bring destruction.

Suitable conditions are also required for the deposition of character armouring. Firstly, the realization that this armour has become an obstacle, that it is no longer useful and that its weight becomes unacceptable. Second, the confidence that the removal of the armour is not associated with a particular additional hazard.

Point two already concerns the treatment itself. Not least due to the emergence of the question: How trustworthy is the person in whose hands I have just placed myself?

The clarification of this question is of central importance. The success of a session for C depends not least on the trustworthiness of T.

Therefore the so-called abstinence rule for therapists (T) and the “equal attention” to clients (C) demanded by psychoanalysis must be remembered at this point. What this means in terms of the legal guidelines for the behaviour of psychologists, doctors and other actors in the healing professions can be read many times on the Internet. But to put it briefly and clearly: T should meet C in a gender-neutral way. Any kind of emotional self-interest of T towards C is forbidden. This applies particularly to male T treating female C. This has to  be emphasized clearly at this point.

Only if T is completely clear in this matter a protected and therefore healthy therapy room could be opened. Only then is it possible to remove the character armour without additional danger. I therefore assume that this aspect has now been clarified. And the shelter has been activated.

Read more about this in the next articles.
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Seite stimmen Sie deren Verwendung zu. Details ansehen

Die Cookie-Einstellungen auf dieser Website sind auf "Cookies zulassen" eingestellt, um das beste Surferlebnis zu ermöglichen. Wenn du diese Website ohne Änderung der Cookie-Einstellungen verwendest oder auf "Akzeptieren" klickst, erklärst du sich damit einverstanden.

Schließen