“That really helped me,” explains a friend, whom I would like to abbreviate as N. “To be honest. I hadn’t expected that at all. How long have we been friends now? Twenty years? Used to work together. Then you’ve turned your attention to healing. I was wondering, what’s it going to be? Then I got the problems with my marriage, divorce, the back and forth with the kids. Terrible. We’ve known each other so long. You noticed, but only marginally. Then there was the squabbling over the apartment. It’s a dream, just gone. Then the depression. Couldn’t get out of bed in the morning. Spent whole days in bed. That job at the paper… also dead. Went to a psychologist, went to a neurologist, did therapy, took antidepressants. It helped. A little. Not enough. I felt trapped in an abyss. Even during the day, it was night.”

“I remember,” I reply. “You thought I dropped you. But I hadn’t. As a friend, I could listen to you, I could talk to you. You went to others for help. Only logical, really. “Who wants their friend to be a therapist?”

N.:“And then you offered it to me. Come to the practice on Tuesday, you said. Why?”

“Because I thought, now I must try – yes, help you. Despite friendship, despite possible doubts on your part. “Despite all the other things that speak against it. And… you agreed to it.”

N.: “I was so desperate that I didn’t care about anything Yes, I was very skeptical. Couldn’t imagine going to my friend Otmar’s practice to get him to treat me. The Otmar with whom I usually go for a beer and coffee, talk about the latest films or our time together at the newspaper. It seemed weird, man.”

“I remember very clearly the moment when the practice assistant came into my room and said: Your friend is here. Okay, I thought, here it is. I had treated family members – well, with different outcome –, but not yet anybody from my inner circle of friends. And then you stood in the doorway and sat down. We started talking. And you told me.“

N.: “Yeah, I just knocked out everything I could think of.”

“It was like a dam burst. And I knew something was possible.”

N.: “Possible what? And what moment do you mean?”

“The moment of greatest sorrow.”

N.: “Yes, I was suddenly full of it. Amazed myself.”

“Then I asked you to get on the couch.”

N.: “Okay, what are you doing? I thought. You touched me on my stomach and chest and explained that I should breathe in and out deeply. I felt increasing pressure. It became tight. Unbearably tight. Suddenly, it became wide.”

“The moment I pulled my hands away and clapped them several times? Or a little later with the wiping motion over your head?”

N.: “I think with the wiping. What did you wipe away?”

“A deep-seated injury. You know what it’s about?”

N.: “Yes, neglect at the beginning of my life.”

“Right.”

N.: “Afterwards I got up from the couch and thought, this can’t have been it. Simple as that? Impossible. Nice try, I said to myself, and went home.”

“So?”

N.: “From that day on, I had no trouble getting out of bed in the morning. I didn’t need antidepressants anymore either. Why did I go to therapy all those years?”

A question to which I know no answer. But what I do know is that the moment of my intervention must have been the right one for my friend.

Once again: Treating friends as therapist, also spouses, the own parents, the children – a No Go from a psychological point of view. Prohibited because of bias, possible conflicts of interest and other reasons. Nevertheless – or all the more surprising and the reason why I’m telling you about it here: it worked. The method of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) is so simple, so clear and so profoundly effective that it can bring great success even under comparatively adverse conditions. This is the only reason why I am reporting on this special case here. A service of friendship that was successful. The concatenation of problematic interactions was apparently solved with N. A reset had taken place.

As I said: TAR is a procedure developed by me to have a methodical and lasting effect on the character armour of a person. As a reminder: The term “character armour” was coined by Wilhelm Reich and refers to the muscular armour of a person based on traumatic experiences. The “frozen life story of a human being”, which is to be understood “as the functional sum of all past events” in the present moment, to be precise. An armouring that is continued and increases with further negative experiences as the biography progresses.

Talking about tensions or cramps at this point, however, could lead the reader’s imagination in the wrong direction. For tensions and cramps, such as pain in the neck, back or elsewhere, are more of a temporary nature and are less deep-seated. The muscular armour does not loosen in a resting position when ostensibly relaxed. There are, however, “ostensible” indications of deep-seated and thus characteristic armour. Nocturnal teeth grinding is one of them. Those who press their teeth against each other in their sleep try to unconsciously release pressure from their character armour.

In my understanding, the character armour of a human being is also the sum of all biological-mental interactions that this person has experienced in the course of his or her life so far. To put it succinctly: whatever a person experiences, it adds up and has a result: current state of mind. But what adds up especially: negative experiences. Much stronger than positive ones. And the greatest destructive intensity, also in the sense of negative reverberation, is caused by traumatisation. Traumatisations shape and color the sum totally, i.e. the character armour. This is exactly where TAR comes in. The best possible result is a reset. 

The article “Trauma & Trauma Removal 6.” remains the reference. More on further aspects in subsequent articles …

Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #spirituellemedizin #resonanzmedizin #traumaablösung #energieheilung #energiearbeit #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Furthermore, the article “Trauma & Trauma Removal 6” remains the reference. This article is about C. (Exploration and Intervention on the treatment table) – the actual procedure of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

The preliminary talk (see Article 7 of this series) has revealed indications of a trauma. A positive anchor was found (see Article 8). The kinesiological test (also 8) points to an active trauma. Now the moment of TAR is approaching – if there are no exclusion criteria for it.

Remember: Exploration and intervention on the treatment table have a physical aspect for C (client). The touch of T (therapist) might get an impulse that exceeds the physical possibilities of C. For example, if C would suffer from osteogenesis imperfecta, the so-called vitreous bone disease, or osteoporosis in the chest area. Similar instability can also result from a tumour in the breast area. In the case of already existing fractures in the sternum, i.e. the breastbone, the procedure TAR should also be abandoned. A pacemaker would also be a criterion for exclusion. A possible sensitivity in the breast area must also be carefully examined.

  If there is no exclusion criterion, C now lies with his back down on the treatment table (see Article 6 of this series). Ideally, this is done immediately after the kinesiological test. Because preliminary talk and testing have caused an emotional wave in C. The TAR should take place as long as this wave is rolling (to put it metaphorically). If the wave has already rolled out, i.e. the emotions have faded away again, the procedure would probably be less successful.

With his back stretched out on the couch, C is advised by T to ask for a stop of the procedure if a physical or mental feeling of distress comes up. If that happens TAR should be aborted.

However, it is desirable that this does not happen, that C rather goes through the process in order to experience relief afterwards. This is equivalent to a probably successful Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

As soon as C is lying down T places his hands. One hand on C’s stomach, the other hand on C’s sternum (heart chakra). The hand on the abdomen points with the fingertips to one side (not towards the abdomen). The hand on the sternum points with the fingertips towards the neck – but does not touch it at all. Contact with the breasts should also be avoided. Not least because female C are often traumatised by male assaults. That is why they are better off with a female T than with a male one anyway.

I have treated women with a wide variety of traumas – including women who suffered the consequences of sexual assault. They came to me because the suffering from these consequences was greater than the tendency to avoid me as a male therapist. All the more I wish that female T’s learn, master and apply this method. The world is full of women who have suffered severe psychological injuries and also suffer from the difficulties of getting rid of them.

T says to C on the treatment table, C may now please close the eyes, and preferably open them again only at T’s request (but at any time if necessary), in order to remember the traumatic experience already mentioned and to breathe in and out deeply.
T “follows” the breath of C as soon as C exhales. At the lowest point T “holds” the hands. C must therefore “breathe against it” the next time C takes a breath. This causes a feeling of reaching into the body of C. De facto a physical illusion. Of course, T does not reach into the body of C. But when C exhales, the chest and also a little bit the belly of C sinks, and T can very well have this almost physical feeling of reaching into something in C. In fact, this is a psycho-energetic exploration of the character armor of C. Very concentrated, T feels a tingling in one or both hands after about 5 to 15 breaths of C. This is an indication of contact with C’s deep-seated trauma.
At the moment of tingling in the hands of T, T lifts the hands from C’s stomach and sternum. But without leaning on C’s stomach and sternum. A mistake that not a few T make at the beginning when they start to learn TAR. Such additional pressure can cause a kinetic addition, which then actually has a physically damaging effect.

T now raises both hands and claps his hands once or several times. C could easily get frightened. Although this is rather unpleasant, it is still helpful. Because a plausible acoustic impulse, which serves to anchor the probably subconsciously felt release effect. Thus a suggestive, if not hypnotic process.
How the acoustic impulse is set is not important in my experience. A snap of the finger would also do it. However, I prefer to clap my hands, because this signal is more intense.
This means that something has been solved in C. What? You might ask. Call it a pattern. In order to completely resolve this pattern, T now “wipes” with one hand about 10 to 20 centimetres over C’s body – without touching it. T starts wiping at the height of C’s navel, wipes towards C’s head and a little bit beyond. Depending on how you feel, two, three times, sometimes more.
Until the actually noticeable release effect occurs. A wave of energy emanating from C and tangible for T. A sure sign that TAR was successful. No – this is not a secret science. You don’t have to be aloof to have these perceptions. Normal sensitivity is sufficient. Which, at least that’s what I claim, every reasonably empathic person is capable of. If one wants to be capable of it.

I am aware that this description does not sound very scientific and may therefore be dubious for rational minds. I would like to point out, body, mind and soul are not decoupled, but exist interlocked. Whatever a person experiences physically – has an effect on his soul. Whatever a person feels spiritually – it has an effect on his biology. Just because this interaction has been little researched and the work on the character armour has hardly been documented by any studies, a weak interaction cannot be assumed here. On the contrary: I describe the TAR method so precisely that psychological researchers feel encouraged to devote themselves to the method described here in the future.

Legal Note: I have developed TAR and therefore I am the author. Therapists are invited to use this method. However, with the remark that I am the creator of it. Publications on this, I would like to confirm here in all clarity, therefore require an authorization by me. Sorry!!!
More on further aspects in subsequent articles …

Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #spirituellemedizin #resonanzmedizin #traumaablösung #energieheilung #energiearbeit #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Article 6 remains the reference for the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR – by Otmar Jenner). This text is about (B) – i.e. finding a so-called anchor in the preliminary talk (A) and subsequent procedures. Namely:

B.a: Finding a positive anchor. Very simple: a particularly beautiful situation / experience in the life of C (client). This situation / experience should be described to T (therapist) briefly but clearly, so that T can set this positive anchor if C reacts with signs of re-traumatisation during the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

B.b.: The naming of the trauma to be worked on during the session. For this purpose C names the most serious psychological and/or physical injury inflicted on him. And then concentrates this traumatic experience into one sentence (example: my father hit me with a belt in the basement).

B.c.: Kinesiological testing of trauma activity. Helpful so that C as well as T get an impression of the current relevance of the trauma.

To B.a.: Finding a positive anchor. Often forgotten by T in connection with the TAR. It is understandable that the search for a positive anchor in the session is like a pleasant but superfluous distraction from the destructive and incisive experience of the trauma to be treated.
However, since it is usually impossible to assess before treatment whether the anchor will be needed afterwards, the anchor should be available immediately afterwards. For this purpose, however, it must be found and activated beforehand.
What is the ideal time for this? A moment that distracts as little as possible. This is probably the beginning of the preliminary talk. If it becomes clear that the session will be about Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR), the anchor should be found and activated.
What does ‘activatable’ mean? C has described T a very beautiful experience precisely enough that T – if necessary – can say to C: “Now please remember …”. This procedure is called setting the anchor. T must therefore have these decisive sentences pre-formulated in his mind before starting TAR.

To B.b.: In the preliminary talk, a mental injury (perhaps several) was discussed. Now we need to focus. If several hurtful events have taken place. One of them is chosen. Probably, the one with the greatest pain impulse. Or, on the contrary, the one with the least intensity of pain – for example, because C wants to „approach this more gently”. T can also ask C: What do you want to work on in this session?
Once the traumatic experience is named, the event should be concentrated in one sentence (another example: when my mother forgot me in the supermarket).

To B.c: The kinesiological test. The test is performed on the left arm. Only if it is not possible on the left arm, the test is performed on the right arm.

1. T asks C to lift his left arm and stretch it at a right angle, i.e. horizontally away from his body, and to react with counter-pressure when T then grabs this arm with his hands approximately at his wrist and then pulls it down for about 2 seconds. C holds against it, pushing the arm upwards.  T feels C’s force and says to C, “This is a yes.”
2. Then T says to C, “I can test with you”. Immediately thereafter pulls the arm down again. C holds against it again.  If a clear drop in strength is felt, this is a no. And steps 1 and 2 should be repeated on the right arm. In case of a yes, continue with 3.
3. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 70% active.” If the muscular response is weak, with a no, continue with 7. Otherwise 4.
4. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 80% active.” If the answer is no, the result is between 70 and 80 percent. In the case of a yes, however, the result is higher.
5. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 90% active.” If the answer is no, the result is between 80 and 90 percent. In the case of a yes, however, the result is higher. Even with a yes, the test ends at this point. A result between 90 and 100 percent is sufficiently accurate.
6. Up to this point, kinesiological testing strengthens the focus of C on the trauma, which in turn will intensify the release effect of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).
7. If the 70% activity was denied, T now says, “Your trauma … is still 60% active.” If the answer is yes, the test ends here. If the answer is no, the test continues with 8.
8. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, “is still 50% active.” If the muscular reaction is strong, i.e. a yes, the test ends at this point. If the answer is no, the test continues with 9.
9. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, “is still 40% active.” If the muscular reaction is strong, i.e. a yes, the test ends at this point. Although the trauma is weakly active, it can still be processed. If the answer is no, the test continues at 10.
10. “Your trauma …,“ T to C says, “is still 30% active.” If this is answered with yes, the procedure of TAR is possible, but will probably lead to a weak release reaction later on. This applies all the more clearly to a no. This is because the “trauma activity” is below a threshold value that is useful for the application of procedure C. Then C (exploration and intervention on the treatment couch – with steps C1 – C10) would be omitted. Instead, D (stimulation of the brain hemispheres and TAR-add-on through targeted eye movement – with steps D1 – D6) could be applied. And / or continue with E (TAR-add-on by singing the warrior syllables – E1 – E3).

More on the next steps in subsequent articles …
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

The previous article (6.) is now the reference and thus the basis for further considerations and comments.

This text is about the preliminary talk (A) before the Trauma Abscission & Removal (abbreviated: TAR – by Otmar Jenner). A very essential part of the session, which is about memory and the processing of memory. Remembering is difficult enough. But the question of processing – problematic …
Some moments of the past we can remember clearly. Others we see less clearly, however hard we try. And others we have lost in a kind of fog. And then there are the moments and times that seem to be erased. These gaps, however, are very subtle. They almost always point to traumatisation. It is the gaps in the continuum of the self that arise as a result of split-off experiences.
The biography of a person is, retrospectively seen, to be regarded as one single narrative. A person as a story, a novel of a life – the different chapters of this narrative are written in principle and logically sequentially. A ribbon woven from events and experiences, which is woven further and further in the time line. But it does not show up in the memory as logically and continuously as life has continued. Events are later jumbled up, are difficult or impossible to assign to time. Some moments, times, events are completely missing. As if someone had torn pages from his own biography.
Nothing about this is as random as it often seems. In fact, these missing pages are deliberately erased. namely, unconsciously. If they were as easy and clear to read as the paragraphs or whole chapters from other times, they would go beyond the scope of the book. In fact, they must be missing so that the owner of his own biography is not killed by them.

This is exactly why the pages were removed. Let’s say, put aside. Well hidden in a place that is difficult to access, in a safe – namely in your own subconscious. What lies buried deep there is deliberately and by one’s own power, even through the most intense thinking, mostly no longer findable and accessible.
That’s a good thing, one might think now. What is forgotten may rest there forever. It would be nice if it would work that way. But unfortunately it doesn’t. What has been hidden in the safe of the subconscious, then hidden from the access of the conscious mind as if through a firewall, has an effect. Unfortunately, for life. And that aftereffect is often very unhealthy. It’s as if these deeply hidden memories are starting to mold and become scruffy. At some point, this has to be ventilated and cleaned up to make you feel better. Or to put it another way: If the garbage is left lying around too long it becomes a rotten corpse.

The preliminary talk is an attempt to open a window of consciousness, so that some light also brightens up the darkness of the subconscious. En passant so to speak, like a scattered light. Because in this room, simply switching on the light does not work – unfortunately. To illuminate the subconscious is a long process. If a person’s day-consciousness were a flashlight, it would take many attempts to shine into the deepest depths of the soul before anything illuminating would become visible. The mysteriousness of one’s own subconsciousness is like a shadow that swallows the light of the focused day-consciousness. Or more succinctly: the subconscious is so irrational that it cannot be dealt with by the rationality of day-consciousness.

Oh, then one could let go all thinking, all asking, all investigating, all wanting to understand and just surrender to the inner pain. Doesn’t clear up anyway.
No, wrong! Even if one cannot simply wipe away, think away or otherwise undo old wounds, deep-seated pain, old injuries and their real, subconsciously stuck reasons. Even if one cannot simply dig out the pages torn out of the biography. Nevertheless, the attempt to devote oneself to one’s own deep-seated injuries is already salutary.
Yes, this attempt alone is valuable. For only the intention to meet oneself in one’s own abysses has a positive mental effect.
Let us call this effect, for simplicity’s sake, resonance.

The person who says I have a mental pain and wants to dedicate myself to the reasons for it – this person resonates within himself and experiences an emotional feedback. A wave builds up. In fact, I think this wave is bigger than the thoughts it contains, because it consists of feelings that are triggered by thoughts.

The preliminary talk with client (C) serves exactly this purpose: To create the resonance with K and to build the wave. When the wave is there, i.e. emotionality becomes present, then the next steps of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) can take place.

How exactly does a therapist (T) create the wave (of emotionality) with C?

Very simple: by asking logical questions accompanied by genuine interest.
Example:
What brings you to me?
I have a problem that …
Can you say when exactly it started?
Well, during the year…
What happened back then?
I did this, and then this happens…
I understood you, but can you describe it to me in more detail?

Go on and ask – until the wave is there. No, this text is not about surfing. But it needs courage here too. The courage to ask as precisely as possible without shyness. Your questions may stir up as long as they are devoted to therapeutic work. In fact, you should be stirring. This is exactly what resonance does. A resonance that is like a beacon of knowledge for K. In the moment of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) a light often shines on you. Figuratively speaking.
To put it logically: the preliminary talk in the sense of an almost rational cognitive process is necessary for the Trauma Abscission & Removal to take effect on a deeper, namely irrational level.

Read more about this in the next articles.
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance