Otmar Jenner

Where is the memory of a person located? Experiences are stored in the limbic system and processed in the neocortex, which enables learning. However, the intestine also learns, because experiences have an effect on peristalsis as well as on the intestinal flora, which has consequences for the hormone balance, among other things. A feedback, which in turn extends to the brain and the limbic system and influences cognitive ability and mental state. When a bone breaks and heals, it is more stable afterwards than before. So it has learned something too. The lungs are always learning. Namely, that it’s easier to breathe in the forest than in the city and smoking’s less healthy. Fortunately, the lungs have a special knowledge in their back pocket, namely how to set in motion a remarkably effective repair program after quitting smoking, for example.
One could continue this list for all organs of the body. The stomach experiences, so it learns. So does the heart, liver, kidneys. In fact, the lymphatic system is also learning. And even blood is trained. As a matter of fact mitochondria, so-called organelles in our cells and a kind of microscopic dinosaurs – even they learn. And are better or worse off, depending on what they learn. The latter can lead to serious diseases.
People learn from experience. Without exception and always. Even when it doesn’t seem like it. And especially they learn from negative experiences. After such an experience they feel worse than before. Like kids who learn that hot plates are hot. According to the same principle, the stomach, lungs, intestines, blood and all bacteria in us learn, even the mitochondria.

These learning processes as a whole are what we call life.

If it were possible to take a complete view of all the experiences made and the associated learning right into the furthest and innermost corners of the human body, this would result in a tree structure of biological and mental interactions – a mapping of individual existence.
Amazing, seen in this way. And sometimes terrible in the result. Because these interactions decide on health, illness, a long life, a short one, death.
These are the interactions between the psyche and the body of a person. In resonance with the environment. In relation to other people. In relation to oneself. Based on experiences with oneself, with other people and the environment. The study and deciphering of these interactions is one of the most challenging and at the same time grateful tasks of the present. Unfortunately, the knowledge of this is not yet advanced. Probably Bachelor level, if at all. In any case, the master’s thesis is still pending. Not to speak of a doctorate. But that is another story.
In principle, the same interactions occur in all people, but they are never the same. Which is why some people are better off, others worse. As a result, some people learn from certain interactions in a meaningful way, which is why they feel better. While others learn less meaningfully and suffer.
Sure, it would be nice if these interactions were easy to grasp. But they are not. The effects of individual existence branch out to the innermost tissues and cause sensitivities in such a complex way that there is always cause for great amazement, often also reason for despair.
And this mysteriousness of individual existence, one might think, increases rather than decreases. Perhaps especially in times of accelerated knowledge growth.

A blessing, if there are simple things in this context.

“That really helped me,” explains a friend, whom I would like to abbreviate as N. “To be honest. I hadn’t expected that at all. How long have we been friends now? Twenty years? Used to work together. Then you’ve turned your attention to healing. I was wondering, what’s it going to be? Then I got the problems with my marriage, divorce, the back and forth with the kids. Terrible. We’ve known each other so long. You noticed, but only marginally. Then there was the squabbling over the apartment. It’s a dream, just gone. Then the depression. Couldn’t get out of bed in the morning. Spent whole days in bed. That job at the paper… also dead. Went to a psychologist, went to a neurologist, did therapy, took antidepressants. It helped. A little. Not enough. I felt trapped in an abyss. Even during the day, it was night.”

“I remember,” I reply. “You thought I dropped you. But I hadn’t. As a friend, I could listen to you, I could talk to you. You went to others for help. Only logical, really. “Who wants their friend to be a therapist?”

N.:“And then you offered it to me. Come to the practice on Tuesday, you said. Why?”

“Because I thought, now I must try – yes, help you. Despite friendship, despite possible doubts on your part. “Despite all the other things that speak against it. And… you agreed to it.”

N.: “I was so desperate that I didn’t care about anything Yes, I was very skeptical. Couldn’t imagine going to my friend Otmar’s practice to get him to treat me. The Otmar with whom I usually go for a beer and coffee, talk about the latest films or our time together at the newspaper. It seemed weird, man.”

“I remember very clearly the moment when the practice assistant came into my room and said: Your friend is here. Okay, I thought, here it is. I had treated family members – well, with different outcome –, but not yet anybody from my inner circle of friends. And then you stood in the doorway and sat down. We started talking. And you told me.“

N.: “Yeah, I just knocked out everything I could think of.”

“It was like a dam burst. And I knew something was possible.”

N.: “Possible what? And what moment do you mean?”

“The moment of greatest sorrow.”

N.: “Yes, I was suddenly full of it. Amazed myself.”

“Then I asked you to get on the couch.”

N.: “Okay, what are you doing? I thought. You touched me on my stomach and chest and explained that I should breathe in and out deeply. I felt increasing pressure. It became tight. Unbearably tight. Suddenly, it became wide.”

“The moment I pulled my hands away and clapped them several times? Or a little later with the wiping motion over your head?”

N.: “I think with the wiping. What did you wipe away?”

“A deep-seated injury. You know what it’s about?”

N.: “Yes, neglect at the beginning of my life.”

“Right.”

N.: “Afterwards I got up from the couch and thought, this can’t have been it. Simple as that? Impossible. Nice try, I said to myself, and went home.”

“So?”

N.: “From that day on, I had no trouble getting out of bed in the morning. I didn’t need antidepressants anymore either. Why did I go to therapy all those years?”

A question to which I know no answer. But what I do know is that the moment of my intervention must have been the right one for my friend.

Once again: Treating friends as therapist, also spouses, the own parents, the children – a No Go from a psychological point of view. Prohibited because of bias, possible conflicts of interest and other reasons. Nevertheless – or all the more surprising and the reason why I’m telling you about it here: it worked. The method of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) is so simple, so clear and so profoundly effective that it can bring great success even under comparatively adverse conditions. This is the only reason why I am reporting on this special case here. A service of friendship that was successful. The concatenation of problematic interactions was apparently solved with N. A reset had taken place.

As I said: TAR is a procedure developed by me to have a methodical and lasting effect on the character armour of a person. As a reminder: The term “character armour” was coined by Wilhelm Reich and refers to the muscular armour of a person based on traumatic experiences. The “frozen life story of a human being”, which is to be understood “as the functional sum of all past events” in the present moment, to be precise. An armouring that is continued and increases with further negative experiences as the biography progresses.

Talking about tensions or cramps at this point, however, could lead the reader’s imagination in the wrong direction. For tensions and cramps, such as pain in the neck, back or elsewhere, are more of a temporary nature and are less deep-seated. The muscular armour does not loosen in a resting position when ostensibly relaxed. There are, however, “ostensible” indications of deep-seated and thus characteristic armour. Nocturnal teeth grinding is one of them. Those who press their teeth against each other in their sleep try to unconsciously release pressure from their character armour.

In my understanding, the character armour of a human being is also the sum of all biological-mental interactions that this person has experienced in the course of his or her life so far. To put it succinctly: whatever a person experiences, it adds up and has a result: current state of mind. But what adds up especially: negative experiences. Much stronger than positive ones. And the greatest destructive intensity, also in the sense of negative reverberation, is caused by traumatisation. Traumatisations shape and color the sum totally, i.e. the character armour. This is exactly where TAR comes in. The best possible result is a reset. 

The article “Trauma & Trauma Removal 6.” remains the reference. More on further aspects in subsequent articles …

Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #spirituellemedizin #resonanzmedizin #traumaablösung #energieheilung #energiearbeit #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Furthermore, the article “Trauma & Trauma Removal 6” remains the reference. This article is about C. (Exploration and Intervention on the treatment table) – the actual procedure of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

The preliminary talk (see Article 7 of this series) has revealed indications of a trauma. A positive anchor was found (see Article 8). The kinesiological test (also 8) points to an active trauma. Now the moment of TAR is approaching – if there are no exclusion criteria for it.

Remember: Exploration and intervention on the treatment table have a physical aspect for C (client). The touch of T (therapist) might get an impulse that exceeds the physical possibilities of C. For example, if C would suffer from osteogenesis imperfecta, the so-called vitreous bone disease, or osteoporosis in the chest area. Similar instability can also result from a tumour in the breast area. In the case of already existing fractures in the sternum, i.e. the breastbone, the procedure TAR should also be abandoned. A pacemaker would also be a criterion for exclusion. A possible sensitivity in the breast area must also be carefully examined.

  If there is no exclusion criterion, C now lies with his back down on the treatment table (see Article 6 of this series). Ideally, this is done immediately after the kinesiological test. Because preliminary talk and testing have caused an emotional wave in C. The TAR should take place as long as this wave is rolling (to put it metaphorically). If the wave has already rolled out, i.e. the emotions have faded away again, the procedure would probably be less successful.

With his back stretched out on the couch, C is advised by T to ask for a stop of the procedure if a physical or mental feeling of distress comes up. If that happens TAR should be aborted.

However, it is desirable that this does not happen, that C rather goes through the process in order to experience relief afterwards. This is equivalent to a probably successful Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

As soon as C is lying down T places his hands. One hand on C’s stomach, the other hand on C’s sternum (heart chakra). The hand on the abdomen points with the fingertips to one side (not towards the abdomen). The hand on the sternum points with the fingertips towards the neck – but does not touch it at all. Contact with the breasts should also be avoided. Not least because female C are often traumatised by male assaults. That is why they are better off with a female T than with a male one anyway.

I have treated women with a wide variety of traumas – including women who suffered the consequences of sexual assault. They came to me because the suffering from these consequences was greater than the tendency to avoid me as a male therapist. All the more I wish that female T’s learn, master and apply this method. The world is full of women who have suffered severe psychological injuries and also suffer from the difficulties of getting rid of them.

T says to C on the treatment table, C may now please close the eyes, and preferably open them again only at T’s request (but at any time if necessary), in order to remember the traumatic experience already mentioned and to breathe in and out deeply.
T “follows” the breath of C as soon as C exhales. At the lowest point T “holds” the hands. C must therefore “breathe against it” the next time C takes a breath. This causes a feeling of reaching into the body of C. De facto a physical illusion. Of course, T does not reach into the body of C. But when C exhales, the chest and also a little bit the belly of C sinks, and T can very well have this almost physical feeling of reaching into something in C. In fact, this is a psycho-energetic exploration of the character armor of C. Very concentrated, T feels a tingling in one or both hands after about 5 to 15 breaths of C. This is an indication of contact with C’s deep-seated trauma.
At the moment of tingling in the hands of T, T lifts the hands from C’s stomach and sternum. But without leaning on C’s stomach and sternum. A mistake that not a few T make at the beginning when they start to learn TAR. Such additional pressure can cause a kinetic addition, which then actually has a physically damaging effect.

T now raises both hands and claps his hands once or several times. C could easily get frightened. Although this is rather unpleasant, it is still helpful. Because a plausible acoustic impulse, which serves to anchor the probably subconsciously felt release effect. Thus a suggestive, if not hypnotic process.
How the acoustic impulse is set is not important in my experience. A snap of the finger would also do it. However, I prefer to clap my hands, because this signal is more intense.
This means that something has been solved in C. What? You might ask. Call it a pattern. In order to completely resolve this pattern, T now “wipes” with one hand about 10 to 20 centimetres over C’s body – without touching it. T starts wiping at the height of C’s navel, wipes towards C’s head and a little bit beyond. Depending on how you feel, two, three times, sometimes more.
Until the actually noticeable release effect occurs. A wave of energy emanating from C and tangible for T. A sure sign that TAR was successful. No – this is not a secret science. You don’t have to be aloof to have these perceptions. Normal sensitivity is sufficient. Which, at least that’s what I claim, every reasonably empathic person is capable of. If one wants to be capable of it.

I am aware that this description does not sound very scientific and may therefore be dubious for rational minds. I would like to point out, body, mind and soul are not decoupled, but exist interlocked. Whatever a person experiences physically – has an effect on his soul. Whatever a person feels spiritually – it has an effect on his biology. Just because this interaction has been little researched and the work on the character armour has hardly been documented by any studies, a weak interaction cannot be assumed here. On the contrary: I describe the TAR method so precisely that psychological researchers feel encouraged to devote themselves to the method described here in the future.

Legal Note: I have developed TAR and therefore I am the author. Therapists are invited to use this method. However, with the remark that I am the creator of it. Publications on this, I would like to confirm here in all clarity, therefore require an authorization by me. Sorry!!!
More on further aspects in subsequent articles …

Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #spirituellemedizin #resonanzmedizin #traumaablösung #energieheilung #energiearbeit #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

Article 6 remains the reference for the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR – by Otmar Jenner). This text is about (B) – i.e. finding a so-called anchor in the preliminary talk (A) and subsequent procedures. Namely:

B.a: Finding a positive anchor. Very simple: a particularly beautiful situation / experience in the life of C (client). This situation / experience should be described to T (therapist) briefly but clearly, so that T can set this positive anchor if C reacts with signs of re-traumatisation during the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).

B.b.: The naming of the trauma to be worked on during the session. For this purpose C names the most serious psychological and/or physical injury inflicted on him. And then concentrates this traumatic experience into one sentence (example: my father hit me with a belt in the basement).

B.c.: Kinesiological testing of trauma activity. Helpful so that C as well as T get an impression of the current relevance of the trauma.

To B.a.: Finding a positive anchor. Often forgotten by T in connection with the TAR. It is understandable that the search for a positive anchor in the session is like a pleasant but superfluous distraction from the destructive and incisive experience of the trauma to be treated.
However, since it is usually impossible to assess before treatment whether the anchor will be needed afterwards, the anchor should be available immediately afterwards. For this purpose, however, it must be found and activated beforehand.
What is the ideal time for this? A moment that distracts as little as possible. This is probably the beginning of the preliminary talk. If it becomes clear that the session will be about Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR), the anchor should be found and activated.
What does ‘activatable’ mean? C has described T a very beautiful experience precisely enough that T – if necessary – can say to C: “Now please remember …”. This procedure is called setting the anchor. T must therefore have these decisive sentences pre-formulated in his mind before starting TAR.

To B.b.: In the preliminary talk, a mental injury (perhaps several) was discussed. Now we need to focus. If several hurtful events have taken place. One of them is chosen. Probably, the one with the greatest pain impulse. Or, on the contrary, the one with the least intensity of pain – for example, because C wants to „approach this more gently”. T can also ask C: What do you want to work on in this session?
Once the traumatic experience is named, the event should be concentrated in one sentence (another example: when my mother forgot me in the supermarket).

To B.c: The kinesiological test. The test is performed on the left arm. Only if it is not possible on the left arm, the test is performed on the right arm.

1. T asks C to lift his left arm and stretch it at a right angle, i.e. horizontally away from his body, and to react with counter-pressure when T then grabs this arm with his hands approximately at his wrist and then pulls it down for about 2 seconds. C holds against it, pushing the arm upwards.  T feels C’s force and says to C, “This is a yes.”
2. Then T says to C, “I can test with you”. Immediately thereafter pulls the arm down again. C holds against it again.  If a clear drop in strength is felt, this is a no. And steps 1 and 2 should be repeated on the right arm. In case of a yes, continue with 3.
3. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 70% active.” If the muscular response is weak, with a no, continue with 7. Otherwise 4.
4. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 80% active.” If the answer is no, the result is between 70 and 80 percent. In the case of a yes, however, the result is higher.
5. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, naming it, “is still 90% active.” If the answer is no, the result is between 80 and 90 percent. In the case of a yes, however, the result is higher. Even with a yes, the test ends at this point. A result between 90 and 100 percent is sufficiently accurate.
6. Up to this point, kinesiological testing strengthens the focus of C on the trauma, which in turn will intensify the release effect of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR).
7. If the 70% activity was denied, T now says, “Your trauma … is still 60% active.” If the answer is yes, the test ends here. If the answer is no, the test continues with 8.
8. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, “is still 50% active.” If the muscular reaction is strong, i.e. a yes, the test ends at this point. If the answer is no, the test continues with 9.
9. “Your trauma …,“ T says to C, “is still 40% active.” If the muscular reaction is strong, i.e. a yes, the test ends at this point. Although the trauma is weakly active, it can still be processed. If the answer is no, the test continues at 10.
10. “Your trauma …,“ T to C says, “is still 30% active.” If this is answered with yes, the procedure of TAR is possible, but will probably lead to a weak release reaction later on. This applies all the more clearly to a no. This is because the “trauma activity” is below a threshold value that is useful for the application of procedure C. Then C (exploration and intervention on the treatment couch – with steps C1 – C10) would be omitted. Instead, D (stimulation of the brain hemispheres and TAR-add-on through targeted eye movement – with steps D1 – D6) could be applied. And / or continue with E (TAR-add-on by singing the warrior syllables – E1 – E3).

More on the next steps in subsequent articles …
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

The previous article (6.) is now the reference and thus the basis for further considerations and comments.

This text is about the preliminary talk (A) before the Trauma Abscission & Removal (abbreviated: TAR – by Otmar Jenner). A very essential part of the session, which is about memory and the processing of memory. Remembering is difficult enough. But the question of processing – problematic …
Some moments of the past we can remember clearly. Others we see less clearly, however hard we try. And others we have lost in a kind of fog. And then there are the moments and times that seem to be erased. These gaps, however, are very subtle. They almost always point to traumatisation. It is the gaps in the continuum of the self that arise as a result of split-off experiences.
The biography of a person is, retrospectively seen, to be regarded as one single narrative. A person as a story, a novel of a life – the different chapters of this narrative are written in principle and logically sequentially. A ribbon woven from events and experiences, which is woven further and further in the time line. But it does not show up in the memory as logically and continuously as life has continued. Events are later jumbled up, are difficult or impossible to assign to time. Some moments, times, events are completely missing. As if someone had torn pages from his own biography.
Nothing about this is as random as it often seems. In fact, these missing pages are deliberately erased. namely, unconsciously. If they were as easy and clear to read as the paragraphs or whole chapters from other times, they would go beyond the scope of the book. In fact, they must be missing so that the owner of his own biography is not killed by them.

This is exactly why the pages were removed. Let’s say, put aside. Well hidden in a place that is difficult to access, in a safe – namely in your own subconscious. What lies buried deep there is deliberately and by one’s own power, even through the most intense thinking, mostly no longer findable and accessible.
That’s a good thing, one might think now. What is forgotten may rest there forever. It would be nice if it would work that way. But unfortunately it doesn’t. What has been hidden in the safe of the subconscious, then hidden from the access of the conscious mind as if through a firewall, has an effect. Unfortunately, for life. And that aftereffect is often very unhealthy. It’s as if these deeply hidden memories are starting to mold and become scruffy. At some point, this has to be ventilated and cleaned up to make you feel better. Or to put it another way: If the garbage is left lying around too long it becomes a rotten corpse.

The preliminary talk is an attempt to open a window of consciousness, so that some light also brightens up the darkness of the subconscious. En passant so to speak, like a scattered light. Because in this room, simply switching on the light does not work – unfortunately. To illuminate the subconscious is a long process. If a person’s day-consciousness were a flashlight, it would take many attempts to shine into the deepest depths of the soul before anything illuminating would become visible. The mysteriousness of one’s own subconsciousness is like a shadow that swallows the light of the focused day-consciousness. Or more succinctly: the subconscious is so irrational that it cannot be dealt with by the rationality of day-consciousness.

Oh, then one could let go all thinking, all asking, all investigating, all wanting to understand and just surrender to the inner pain. Doesn’t clear up anyway.
No, wrong! Even if one cannot simply wipe away, think away or otherwise undo old wounds, deep-seated pain, old injuries and their real, subconsciously stuck reasons. Even if one cannot simply dig out the pages torn out of the biography. Nevertheless, the attempt to devote oneself to one’s own deep-seated injuries is already salutary.
Yes, this attempt alone is valuable. For only the intention to meet oneself in one’s own abysses has a positive mental effect.
Let us call this effect, for simplicity’s sake, resonance.

The person who says I have a mental pain and wants to dedicate myself to the reasons for it – this person resonates within himself and experiences an emotional feedback. A wave builds up. In fact, I think this wave is bigger than the thoughts it contains, because it consists of feelings that are triggered by thoughts.

The preliminary talk with client (C) serves exactly this purpose: To create the resonance with K and to build the wave. When the wave is there, i.e. emotionality becomes present, then the next steps of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) can take place.

How exactly does a therapist (T) create the wave (of emotionality) with C?

Very simple: by asking logical questions accompanied by genuine interest.
Example:
What brings you to me?
I have a problem that …
Can you say when exactly it started?
Well, during the year…
What happened back then?
I did this, and then this happens…
I understood you, but can you describe it to me in more detail?

Go on and ask – until the wave is there. No, this text is not about surfing. But it needs courage here too. The courage to ask as precisely as possible without shyness. Your questions may stir up as long as they are devoted to therapeutic work. In fact, you should be stirring. This is exactly what resonance does. A resonance that is like a beacon of knowledge for K. In the moment of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) a light often shines on you. Figuratively speaking.
To put it logically: the preliminary talk in the sense of an almost rational cognitive process is necessary for the Trauma Abscission & Removal to take effect on a deeper, namely irrational level.

Read more about this in the next articles.
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

The shelter exists because therapists (T) have clarified their attitude towards clients (C) as already described (abstinence, equal attention, gender neutrality, no emotional self-interest).

Now to the course of a session with Trauma Abscission & Removal (abbreviated: TAR – by Otmar Jenner).

A. The preliminary conversation:

1. C has a problem and reports about it. This is the reason why C comes to the practice of T at all.
2. Since not all problems are based on traumatizations, T is challenged to find out in a conversation with C whether her/his problem (of whatever kind) is the result of a traumatization.  If so, there is the possibility of a recent experience of horror, not yet integrated horror, or the possibility of a distant mental injury (perhaps suffered in childhood).
3. T then asks C specifically for incisive, painful experiences (psychological as well as physical).
4. From C’s reactions (strong emotional expression, drastic verbal description or, on the contrary, almost indifference, as if standing next to her-/himself, apathy), T can tell how serious the traumatizations experienced by C are and whether a trauma detachment makes sense in this case.  
5. If this is to be affirmed, T explains the meaning of further work on this trauma (with the aim of dissolving it / trauma exploration and intervention) and describes C the further procedure.
6. If C agrees and expressly declares this to T, the further steps of the Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) can take place.

B. Further preliminary work (an anchor, a trauma, a test):

1. Finding a positive anchor: T asks C to remember a very beautiful life experience, a moment of joy and strength.
2. T asks C to describe this moment very precisely and to recall it scenically (like in a short film): this will be the positive anchor.
3. T also stores the positive anchor in his memory so that he can set it at C at any time. This is when the recapitulation of negative experiences during the TAR seems to overstrain C and the treatment is about to go of the rail (which I myself have never experienced before with any such treatment, but nevertheless consider it possible).
4. Isolating the trauma: T now comes back to the incisive and painful experiences already mentioned by C and asks C to name the most painful.
5. Kinesiological testing of the trauma: T asks C to stand up and stretch out his left arm. T now presses C’s wrist with increasing intensity for 2 to 3 seconds and asks C to hold against it. It is not a question of who is the strongest, but rather of C’s muscular response to the increasing pressure that T exerts. T remembers C’s impulse.
6. Now T speaks to C: “I can test with you.” And repeats the pressure on C’s wrist on the outstretched arm. C’s impulse must not be significantly weaker, because that would be a no.
7. In this case the procedure would have to be repeated a few minutes later, then on C’s other arm.
8. However, if further testing is immediately possible T says to C: “Your trauma is over 50 percent active.“
9. If C then vigorously resists, which corresponds to a yes, T repeats the test at C, but now saying: “Over 70 percent of your trauma is active”. If thereupon a yes comes again, the test can be repeated with “90 percent”. If “50 percent” has already been answered weakly, i.e. with a “no”, you would have to find out whether it is a value above or below 30 percent. Because below 30 percent is so weak that this “residual traumatization” cannot possibly be solved with TAR right now.
10. For the further work on the trauma it is necessary that T as well as C keep the tested active value of the trauma in memory, in order to be able to measure the treatment success later (even if it is not at all completely describable, what exactly this active value measures, because it is a size of the subconscious).
11. Since exploration and intervention in TAR include mechanical aspects, possible medical exclusion criteria for such treatment must be established at the latest now: a tendency to brittle bones or osteoporosis, a tumor disease in the abdomen or chest, cardiac pacemakers, etc. Then C would have to be omitted and the procedure under D would have to be continued. 

C. Exploration and intervention on the treatment couch: So for C while lying, while T sits on one side (ideally on a rolling stool). Because the moment of the actual procedure of TAR is approaching. However, all steps that take place in the same way should be explained briefly and precisely to C beforehand.

1. As soon as C lies stretched out with his back on the treatment couch (and the further course is communicated), T places one hand on C’s sternum (heart chakra) and the other hand on C’s stomach (solar plexus). As I said: positioned so that the fingertips of T’s hand on the heart chakra point directly upwards, i.e. in the direction of C’s head, while T’s hand on the solar plexus is positioned so that the fingertips point to one side of the body, but not towards C’s feet. This positioning of the hands is important to avoid possible alignment with genitals. If C is female and T male, C can also place her hands on the corresponding parts of her body, whereupon T would place his hands on C’s. C’s hands then built a kind of buffer (which is often perceived as protection against male T for women).  Remember: The shelter in the sense of a resilient confidence building is of central importance for the success of a treatment).
2. T now asks C to close both eyes and to remember as closely as possible the traumatisation experienced (visual, acoustic, olfactory, tactile). In short: visible, audible, smellable, perceptible) and at the same time breathe in and out deeply.
3. T follows with his hands the raising and lowering of C’s chest during one or two of C’s breaths, then concentrating on C’s exhalation and slowly exerting a growing pressure on C’s chest and abdomen.
4. T may have the feeling of touching C in her/his innermost, as if T’s hands were wandering into C’s body to grasp a deeply hidden pain. I would like to emphasize that such a feeling is not as irrational as it sounds according to this methodology, but quite plausible. Because through the deliberate and conscious memory of C’s deep-seated injury and the additional intention of T to heal exactly this injury, now probably also noticeable from T, namely the hardening of C’s character armour – this is precisely what happens in the so-called exploration of trauma. Namely the possibility to feel this directly. T will probably perceive a kind of tingling in his hands. But if this is not perceptible to T, it does not mean that the procedure is not suitable for T as the performer.
5. At the moment of greatest intensity, which also means an increased mechanical pressure and the moment of intervention, T lifts both hands from the body of C and claps once or several times into the hands. This is a signal to the subconscious of C. It means: Now it is accomplished, the trauma resolved. The clapping of hands can be so loud that C is easily frightened. Even if this is not perceived as pleasant, it is still helpful. Because all the deeper the trauma detachment finds its way into the subconscious.
6. Immediately afterwards, T makes a subtle wiping movement with one or both hands about 10 to 20 centimetres above C’s body. Beginning at the solar plexus towards the head and beyond the head. Even if it sounds strange: With it T wipes the trauma energy from the body of C. Absolutely: without the slightest physical touch.
7. Right now C should keep her/his eyes closed. An opening of the eyes would distract C from the inner perception by external perception, whereby the release effect of the trauma detachment would possibly be overlooked or rather “over felt”. If the release effect is not perceived from C immediately, this does not mean that the trauma detachment has failed. The release effect often comes in waves. With some people in gentle waves, with others powerful. With some people are so powerful that they get scared and T have to calm them down.
8. If calming persuasion does not help, the anchor should be set. T then reminds C of the anchor and asks C for a few minutes to think of nothing else than this beautiful idea.
9. The release effect is best described as an energy wave. Perceptible from C itself, but also perceptible from T. As an energy wave that rolls from C into T’s field (aura), flows and feels different with every trauma release. Every now and then the wave comes with a delay, so the release effect only occurs after two minutes at the most. For T it’s a matter of waiting for this time.
10. Anyway, it is helpful if C rests undisturbed for a few minutes after the procedure of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) – trauma exploration and intervention.

D. Stimulation of the brain hemispheres and a TAR add-on through guided eye movement: T now helps C to straighten up from the couch and to move into a seated posture. Either on a standing chair or sideways on the treatment couch, facing T.

1. T now asks C to look with her/his eyes at the tip of her/his index finger (it doesn’t matter whether the finger of T’s right or left hand is used). T then raises the hand with the extended index finger in front of C’s face so that C can look at T’s fingertip from a distance of about 50 to 80 centimeters.
2. T now asks C to think again of the trauma that has just been detached (without, however, immersing her-/himself in it in the sense of a scenic experience).
3. Directly after this explanation T draws with his index finger the figure of a lying eight into the air in front of C’s face. Starting with a movement towards right side up (seen from T). Again and again. For about one minute to one and a half minutes. Eights so large, i.e. with such a wide movement of T’s finger in front of C’s eyes, that C’s eyes move to the outermost edges of her/his view, but not beyond, so that C can follow the finger movement of T with both eyes. And just so fast that no jerky eye movements occur, but an evenly wandering after-glance from C is possible. The meaning of this probably strange-looking action of T: Because both eyes are linked with different hemispheres of the brain, the left and right hemisphere of C’s brain are harmonized. Since traumatization is not preserved equally in both hemispheres and thus remains more active in one side, the eye movement guided  as described causes a destructive memory backlog to flow off (probably on the right brain hemisphere – but this has yet to be researched sufficiently to be considered factual). T’s finger movement ends with a movement upwards – so never descending.
4. Then T lets the hand sink and asks C now for current sensations concerning the trauma just solved. Possible answers from C: “Feels a little better.” – “Feel relieved.” – “Something’s come loose.” – “A stone is gone.” – “Feel much softer.” – Can’t say exactly what is. But it feels different.” – “I don’t know, I can’t judge.“
5. In any case, T now repeats the painting of the figure eight in front of C’s face described in point 3 (D). And then point 4 (D). This is practiced five to seven times in total.
6. Then C needs a break of up to five minutes.

E.  TAR add-on by singing the so called warrior syllables A, Om, Hung, Ram, dZa: The meaning of the syllables are: A for Buddha – love, Om for Brahma – devotion, Hung for shelter – joy, Ram – truthfulness, dZa – action! T should not make a secret of the meaning. But too much explanation is distracting..

1. T sings the warrior syllables slowly, but as expressively as possible, then asks C to remember the emotional injury already dealt with (but without diving into the idea of it in the sense of scenic experience).
2. T now asks C to join in, i.e. to sing along.
3. 7 cycles should be sung. If this is not sufficient, another 7 cycles can follow..

F. Final kinesiological testing of the remaining trauma activity:

1. Continue as described in B 5 to 9.
2. If the “active value” of the detached trauma now exceeds 30 percent, another follow-up session should be arranged at a later date to repeat the entire procedure described up to this point.

G. Concluding discussion: C takes stock of the experience, describes the current mood. T in turn gives feedback and shares his own impressions, provided that they are directly related to the therapeutic work performed.

As I said before: I developed the method of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) and I am therefore the originator. Therapists can use this procedure. However, with the hint that it comes from me. Publications on this, I would like to confirm here in all clarity, require an authorization by me.
All aspects presented in this article will be described in more details in further articles.

Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscession #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

In order to understand the presentation of the procedure of Trauma Abscission & Removal (TAR) that I have discovered, no further training is required. But prior medical knowledge is just as helpful as knowledge in psychology is useful. Since the procedure has manual aspects, it can only be used by therapists (abbreviated: T) under certain conditions. Non-medical and alternative practitioners may use it in the sense of depth-psychologically founded exploration and intervention. Exploration and intervention in TAR takes place by placing the hands with the palms of the hands on two parts of the client’s body (abbreviated: C).

TAR is practiced by T while sitting or standing. C lies on the back, probably on a treatment couch, but stretched out on the floor would also be possible (but the further description here refers to a position of C on a treatment couch).

So C is located on the couch, T sits or stands on one side next to it. T now places the hands on C as follows: one hand on the lower end of the breastbone on the chest of C, i.e. on the heart chakra, the other hand on the abdomen, i. e. the solar plexus of C.

Whether T sits on the left or right side of C’s body – accordingly T’s right hand or left hand lies on C’s heart chakra and the right or left hand on C’s solar plexus –, is less important than the actual positioning of the hands on the body. The hand, which is placed on the heart chakra, is positioned in such a way that the fingertips point directly upwards, i.e. in the direction of C’s head. On the contrary: is the hand on the solar plexus placed with the fingertips pointing to one side of C’s body, but not in the direction of C’s feet (this is important – why exactly will be explained in detail later).

With these touches at the two points T can now reach the character armour of C directly and well. Exploration and intervention of a traumatization experienced by C are now possible. If this succeeds, the resulting effect can be described as a release (a relief and liberation, release from a heavy load).

According to Wilhelm Reich, a person’s character armour is always developed through painful experiences in childhood and the resulting resistance and limitation in his ability to surrender tot the flow of life. No wonder: devotion in the sense of opening the self is associated with the risk of further injury. The medieval knights already knew this when they stumbled through the Middle Ages crammed into their metal armour. The removal of the armament is therefore a liberation. But at the wrong time and in the wrong place, it may bring destruction.

Suitable conditions are also required for the deposition of character armouring. Firstly, the realization that this armour has become an obstacle, that it is no longer useful and that its weight becomes unacceptable. Second, the confidence that the removal of the armour is not associated with a particular additional hazard.

Point two already concerns the treatment itself. Not least due to the emergence of the question: How trustworthy is the person in whose hands I have just placed myself?

The clarification of this question is of central importance. The success of a session for C depends not least on the trustworthiness of T.

Therefore the so-called abstinence rule for therapists (T) and the “equal attention” to clients (C) demanded by psychoanalysis must be remembered at this point. What this means in terms of the legal guidelines for the behaviour of psychologists, doctors and other actors in the healing professions can be read many times on the Internet. But to put it briefly and clearly: T should meet C in a gender-neutral way. Any kind of emotional self-interest of T towards C is forbidden. This applies particularly to male T treating female C. This has to  be emphasized clearly at this point.

Only if T is completely clear in this matter a protected and therefore healthy therapy room could be opened. Only then is it possible to remove the character armour without additional danger. I therefore assume that this aspect has now been clarified. And the shelter has been activated.

Read more about this in the next articles.
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance

An entrepreneur in bankruptcy. His administrator reports terrible developments almost every day.  The feeling of slowly dissolving. Crumbling life. Horror in installments.
A soldier with war experience in Iraq. Especially terrible: his own actions.
Or the nurse whose partner is hit by a car on a crossing. The fact that she takes a few steps behind him saves her life, not her psyche.
Or a woman giving birth at the turn of the year. Because the hospital staff has already entered the celebration mode, the mother-to-be has to wait. The feeling of being torn apart and blown up by labour pains in the deserted  and cool corridor.
Or the couple whose only son takes his own life. Perhaps the greatest horror of all. A trauma.

The consequences of a traumatic experience for the life of every single person are different. For some, the memory of the traumatic event is limited, others experience an echo, also called flashback. Some sufferers then have difficulty concentrating. Others experience themselves as particularly jumpy, suffer from sleep disturbances, tend to overreact to feelings (increased irritability, outbursts of anger, crying fits) or feel alienated from themselves. Some sufferers experience all of the symptoms, others do not. For some, the symptoms fade after a few weeks, eventually disappearing completely. In this sense medicine and psychology would not speak of a permanent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

But whether it fades quickly or slowly, a noticeably unpleasant after-effect or more imperceptible consequences – experiences of horror are buried deep in a person’s psyche. They then get stuck in the frame of the soul and actually sit in the bones of the person affected.

The physician, psychologist and sociologist Wilhelm Reich, who was fiercely opposed during his lifetime, invented the term “character armour” to describe the sum of a person’s defensive patterns as a result of his biography.

I also use this term – but with a special biological focus. In my experience, a person’s character armour is formed by the traumatic experiences that are stored in the brain, but also in the muscle memory. The latter as a special pattern of hardening, which can be dissolved by certain procedures – to put it simply.

Biodynamic body therapy according to Gerda Boyesen, for example, is a method that reaches the client’s character armour through manual work on the client’s body (similar to massage) and can have a far-reaching psychological effect on him. Old blockades can thus be solved. But this is a very time-consuming process that requires many sessions.
While the New York biochemist Ida Rolf only thought of the human being’s erection against gravity when she developed the method of Structural Integration – the method later called Rolfing also has a profound healing effect on the character armour.

Inspired among others by these methods, enriched by the energetic method catalogue of spiritual medicine, I developed my methodology of Trauma Abscission & Removal (abbreviated: TAR) about ten years ago. A method that effects the character armour directly and is just made for this purpose.

Many people have very stressful experiences in their bones. To dissolve these loads as completely as possible or at least to reduce them – TAR has proven to be very effective.

Read more about this in the next articles.
Stay tuned!

Yours – Otmar Jenner

P.S. Dear readers, English is not my mother tongue. If you find serious mistakes in the wording of an article, please let me know (oj@otmarjenner.de).

#otmarjenner #tar #traumaabscission #traumaremoval #traumarelief #traumadetachment #traumaredemptio #energyhealing #healing #happiness #heal #healingvibes #energy #spirituality #meditation #spiritual #chakras #goodvibes #selflove #psychic #yoga #energybites #instagood #metaphysical #awakening #spiritualhealing #positiveenergy #energyhealer #consciousliving #consciousness #healingprocess #justhealing #compassion #forgiveness #guidance